This article was written by David B. Lipski, Esq of Howard & Howard Attorneys, P.C. and ran in Commercial Inc., Magazine in 2001

Preventive Strategies for Owners and Managers

If the tenant pays, the tenant stays, and the commercial property owner is satisfied, at least for a month. When the tenant defaults, in falling to pay rent or other charges due under the lease, the real estate investment is at risk, and both the owner and manager have a problem. As a commercial property owner, you need your tenant to comply with its lease agreement and pay the rent as it comes due. Alternatively, you need a replacement tenant. The owner counts on the property manager to encourage ten ant compliance, as the Income stream from leases in red estate developments provides the cash flow necessary to pay the bills as they come due, to the lender or otherwise, and to make the real estate investment a worthwhile and profitable venture.

If you have a non-compliant tenant, and the fiscal goals of the real estate development are not being met, you may need to evict your defaulting tenant and replace it with a better candidate.  At the same time, you want to remove the tenant effectively and efficiently and collect the overdue money, without protracted and costly litigation. What can you do to increase the likelihood of the tenant compliance with the lease agreement or, alternatively, facilitate eviction, the insertion of a replacement tenant, and the collection of the tenant’s arrearage? The short answer is, know the relevant law and how to apply it, and have your contracts drafted with an eye toward the effective application of that law. Now, you may be thinking, “yeah, great, but my leases are already signed, I can’t change them now, and it’s too late to get a personal guaranty or a security agreement” But that is not totally true, you can also use the applicable law as a technique for changing existing agreements and creating new and improved contracts.

I. The Michigan Summary Proceedings Act

At the heart of managing the defaulting tenant is the Michigan Summary Proceedings Act which was created in 1972 to create a single, uniform system of law for the summary repossession of premises by a real estate owner and to replace the widely disparate and chaotic law prevailing at the time. For the most part, that goal has been accomplished, when one compares the brevity of a District Court summary proceeding to the antiquated Circuit Court ejectment action. You con still seek eviction in Circuit Court through an ejectment action, but it doesn’t happen often, as it takes too much time, Of course, the defaulting tenant prefers to deal with eviction in Circuit Court, where time is on its side. Using the Act strategically, in combination with well written agreements, can effectively thwart this type of tenant delay tactic.

There are five general stages in the life of a summary proceeding: (1) a seven day demand for possession, or a thirty day notice to quit (2) the summons and complaint; (3) the hearing and/or trial; (4) the judgment; and (5) the order of eviction.

A. Demand for possession   The first step in a summary proceeding Is to serve a written demand for possession on the tenant. The demand customarily gives the tenant seven days to cure a default and If the default is not cured w that time, the landlord may have Its attorney start the summary proceeding lawsuit on the eighth day. The demand may be based on one of several bases, including the non-payment of rent, a continuing health hazard, or continuing injury to the premises. However, a seven day demand for possession may be redeemed, or cured, If the tenant pays the amount specified in the demand within ten days of any Judgment Issued by the District Court. its Important to remember that If you serve a demand for possession, the tenant stays if the tenant pays.

Demands for possession can, and should, be prepared and served by the properly manager or owner. How ever, before doing it for the first time, you should walk through the appropriate court forms with an experienced real estate attorney and then once you have them mastered, do it your self. This will save time and money as the properly manager is the person most aware of the specifics of a tenancy. A good rule of thumb is to immediately serve a demand for possession each and every time a tenant defaults. Whether you actually follow through on the lawsuit is another Issue. By incorporating the demand into your standard business practice, you are always ready. This is effective for building a future termination case where the lease a for termination if the tenant defaults repeatedly during a certain calendar period. it is especially effective for encouraging tenant compliance and preventing costly delays.

B. Notice to Quit   Managers and owners may also prepare and serve thirty day notices to quit. By serving a thirty day notice to quit, you are seeking possession with out giving the tenant a right of redemption. Possession through notice to quit may be sought based on a ten ant’s breach of the lease, or at the expiration of the lease, in this situation, if the tenant pays, but does so after a valid notice to quit is timely served, the tenant doesn’t stay. Be careful when accepting rent payments after serving a notice to quit.

1. Mid-Stream Termination

if you are seeking to terminate a tenancy in the middle of the lease term, as opposed to at its natural expiration, the lease must provide that the landlord has a right to terminate for the specific breach upon which you base the eviction. Otherwise, you will be forced to litigate whether the breach is material prolong the proceeding. The problem with debating the mater a breach is that It Is evaluated on a continuum, and the answer Is not clear cut. it Is often costly to litigate the issue of materiality and may allow the defaulting tenant more time to occupy the premises while In breach and prevent you from starting a bu out arid the rent commencement with a replacement tenant.

2. Termination at Expiration

There is some disagreement on whether you must serve a thirty day notice to quit after lease expiration, or whether you can immediately file the summary proceeding action on the day after the lease expires. The Act itself suggests that you may do either. However, when a ease expires, it becomes a month to month tenancy. There is a statute that requires a notice to quit to terminate a month to month tenancy. As different Judges may interpret the law differently, the safest move Is to serve a notice to quit thirty days before the expiration of the lease term, assuming that you want the space back.

C. The Lawsuit, the Judgment, the Eviction  After the expiration of the demand or notice, you may have your attorney start the eviction action. Unlike the demand or notice to quit, the complaint must be signed by an attorney, and the attorney must appear in The District Court on behalf of the landlord. The hearing will occur, on average, about two weeks after the filing of the complaint, At that time, the Court will usually do one of three things (1) hold o hearing and rule on whether there is a triable Issue; (2) hold an immediate trial; or (3) adjourn the matter for trial at a later date, which may or may not be a trial by jury, depending on what the lease says and whether the tenant made a timely jury demand and paid the jury fee.

At the hearing or trial, the tenant will raise its defenses to the eviction, which are also enumerated In the Act. Tenants will often argue that the eviction is In retaliation for its complaints about the condition of the premises and file counterclaims for a rent set-off based on these alleged breaches of lease by the landlord.

Once the judge or jury makes its determination a judgment will be entered.  If the judgment is in favor of the landlord, the tenant will be given ten days to move, After the ten day period passes, the landlords attorney may file an order of eviction and cause a court officer to physically remove the tenant and its belongings.  All of this can transpire in as little as thirty to sixty days, depending on whether you serve a demand for possession or notice to quit. However, the speed and efficiency of the summary proceeding will be dictated by the contents of the agreements between the part and whether you and your attorney correctly follow the procedures of the Act.

II. Tenant Viability and Preventive Drafting of Agreements

A. Tenant Viability and Bargaining Power  Your ability to succeed In a summary proceeding Is gauged In large part by the content of the contracts with the tenant, as well as its financial wherewithal As you well know, the first steps In the commencement of any tenancy, is to evaluate the financial capability of the tenant, the amount of risk it represents to the development, and how it harmonizes with neighboring tenants. The nature of the development will obviously determine how finicky one can be. The situation will vary with whether the development is office, industrial or retail, the caliber and occupancy of the building or shopping center, and the strength of the tenant. Some landlords must rely more on small business tenants, and others do not have that concern, as their developments are in demand, and in optimal locations. The bargaining power of the parties usually affects what is included in the lease agreement or other contracts between them.

B. The Lease, Guaranty and Security Agreement In any tenancy situation, once you have decided to do business with a tenant, the important issue becomes the terms of the agreements between the parties and how they work in conjunction with the Act.

1. Personal or Corporate Guaranty

To the extent you can, try to get a personal guaranty of either the parent corporation of your tenant, one of the tenant’s principals, or another credit-

worthy person, All too often, tenant bankruptcies make it virtually impossible to collect from or evict a tenant until the bankruptcy court grants per mission, after the court imposed dead line for assuming or rejecting a lease has passed. A detailed analysis of the effects of bankruptcy law on tenancies is beyond the scope of this article. The important point is that a personal guaranty of one of the principals of a corporation or another person or entity can help the landlord collect if the tenant files for bankruptcy and can encourage tenant compliance based on the risk imposed on the guarantor when the tenant defaults.

2. Security Agreement, Financing Statement, Fixture Filing

If you finance a tenant build out, and you want to make sure you are paid on a construction loan, be aware that in Michigan there is no such thing as a landlord’s lien. The tenant has a right to all its trade fixtures, which are defined broadly under Michigan law as any fixtures tenant uses in its business. Accordingly, if you want to ensure that you will be paid on your loan, or have security for your loan if tenant defaults or files for bankruptcy, have tenant sign a security agreement. File a financing statement and a fixture filing against all available collateral. This will give you priority to the collateral addressed in the security agreement, if it is not already encumbered by another secured creditor. The security agreement will also encourage tenant compliance, given the risk of loss it presents to tenants. A good overall strategy is to include a security provision right in the lease, which covers any lease default, whether or not pertaining to a build out.

3. Lease Agreement

The default provisions of a lease agreement are critical and dictate how effectively one can use the Act. If the landlord files a summary proceeding, and the tenant has a competent attorney, it will file an answer to the complaint, affirmative defenses, a jury demand, and a counterclaim alleging a set-off right. Even if the defenses and counterclaims are meritless, they buy the tenant time, which is always the tenant’s best friend. As such, you want to make sure your lease contains a waiver of jury trial, waiver of counter claim and waiver of set-off.

Some tenant attorneys will try to incorporate language into a lease dictating that the performance covenants of the lease are dependent covenants, such that a failure to per form by one party discharges the performance requirements of the other. This will tie up an eviction. Tenants are also big fans of inserting clauses requiring that any dispute under the lease be submitted to non-binding facilitation or mediation for at least sixty days, which essentially kills the summary proceeding. by eliminating the landlord’s best weapon. . . speed. Accordingly, your lease should expressly indicate that the tenant’s duty to perform is independent from the landlord’s, and that all covenants of the lease are independent.

As a deterrent, and to aid your principal’s bottom line, the lease should call for maximum interest on past due obligations and a requirement that tenant pay the attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of any collection or eviction effort by the landlord. These are strong clauses, can encourage compliance, given the downside they represent for tenant, and can make the eviction process a less expensive venture for the landlord. If at all possible, try to avoid any pro-tenant clauses that give the tenant more notice and time to cure than the seven days allowed for with a demand for possession. The longer the cure period, the greater the likelihood the tenant will race to Circuit Court and file an action to determine interests in land and/or for an injunction and declaratory judgment, to avoid the speed of a summary proceeding, in favor of lengthy and costly Circuit Court litigation

III. Using the Act to Revise Bad Agreements and Create New Ones

Bad agreements can delay or even prevent the expeditious use of the Act. This can cost money in delaying the build out and insertion of a replacement tenant. Many times property managers and landlords were not responsible for negotiating the agreements that exist between the landlord and the tenant, For example, when a REIT buys a shopping center, it inherits someone else’s leases and worse yet, those leases are in mid-stream, The same is true for a pension fund buying an office building.

By closely monitoring all the dead lines for payment and other performance in a lease and strictly enforcing them, you may find an actionable breach. The mere threat of an expedient summary proceeding may bring a tenant to the bargaining table. By sending a demand for possession or notice to quit based on a breach, and if necessary, filing and serving a summary proceeding complaint, you open the door to new documentation.

IV. Conclusion

It is not the purpose of this article to conspire against commercial tenants, but to address how best to handle the tenant relationship when all efforts at amicable cooperation have failed. When the situation gets bad, and the money isn’t coming in, property managers must answer to their principals, who in turn have to answer to their lenders and partners. By preventively drafting a lease, obtaining a guaranty and security agreement, all with a shrewd eye toward the Act, a property manager can more effectively add to its principal’s bottom line, thereby increasing the manager’s own value to its clients. Even with bad agreements, the Act provides some opportunity to revisit the contracts between the parties, make them better for the landlord and manager alike, and obtain new agreements.